American Comedy Series (no spoilers in this Lucifer review 3rd Dog)
Lucifer, as you may have already guessed, follows Lucifer Morningstar (Tom Ellis), who has escaped Hell in order to have a little fun on earth running a nightclub and playing with the lives of mere mortals. He’s apparently been doing this for a while when one of his so-called projects gets murdered, leading him to meet Detective Chloe Dancer (Chicago Fire’s Lauren German). Since Lucifer is the literal devil, he’s great at convincing people to respond to questions they might not normally otherwise be willing to answer. This trickery leads to plenty of light-spirited comedy during the hour-long drama. It also leads Lucifer to become a very helpful police consultant.
The series, created by Tom Kapinos, plays on the notion that Lucifer Morningstar might not be all bad, that God sent him down to Hell as the best option to take care of the souls who reside there. But it’s safe to say that Lucifer has some daddy issues, making him an even more complex character than you would expect from this sort of show. Fox actually does a lot to expand upon the basic procedural elements with Lucifer, introducing characters like psychologist Linda (Suits’ Rachael Harris), who help Lucifer delve into who he is and why he is on Earth. – Cinemablend
The sly FOX, Tom Ellis, who plays Lucifer in this unique buddy cop show brings a new level to antihero. The term antihero was first used as early as 1714 and the concept has also been identified in classical Greek drama, Roman satire, and Renaissance literature.
Still, Lucifer seems to be operating without much purpose – other than sheer debauchery – when Detective Chloe Decker (Lauren German) enters the scene, seeking to solve a murder that took place outside the club. Moreover, Chloe appears to be immune to Lucifer’s influence (one is tempted to invoke the image of Jedi mind tricks), which intrigues him, as he tags along in helping her to decipher what happened. – Variety
I totally disagree with Variety’s take on Lucifer. What images do you conjure up when you here All Hell Broke Loose? You’ll notice there’s more than British charm going on in the dialogue. Pandemonium could look like there’s no purpose, however, therein LIES the Tale.
You’ll discover what’s behind the genius of Stephen Hawking in this 2014 British biographical coming-of-age romantic drama film.
Bottom Line: Love makes the world go-round…with a big bang.
“There should be no boundary to human endeavor. However bad life may seem where there is life there is hope.” – Stephen Hawking
Stephen’s black hole theory actually led him to an even greater realization… life is unique and love truly conquers all. “Look at what we’ve made!” – Stephen Hawking
In script writing, you’ll find that every scriptwriter wants to have a brilliant line like this one to sum up the grand endeavor.
Stephen’s personal script went beyond the ordinary. His particle or particular view will lead the universal consciousness to discover His Story. I give the film five stars, a raving review, and strongly recommend watching it.
Personally, I was captivated by the scenes of Stephen’s physical struggles of which I can unequivocally relate, and the desire to mentally reach beyond the stars, and the gentle nature that yearns to embrace love in its finest hour. Furthermore, speaking of my particular view, I’m compelled to post my theory of everything – His Story (history).
Let me explain my theory, which is summed up in this line: The greatest script ever written is inscribed in the stars and beyond!
WARNING: Stop here, if you don’t want to go down the black hole. Please understand, it will take some TIME to tell this tale.
If you’re ready to leap beyond the horizon into empty space… then follow along… as we move from theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking’s black hole to physicist Nassim Haramein’s black whole.
“What happened at the beginning of time?” “Wind back the clock!” “The universe was born from a black hole?” – Hawking
“What unifies everything everywhere?” “…were these ancient civilizations from all points across the globe leaving us detailed information about the fundamental physics of creation?” “…scientific evidence that everything is one.” – Haramein
You’ll discover the plot points as we move from Nassim Haramein’s documentary, The Connected Universe, to astrophysicist Hugh Ross’ Journey Toward Creation. I recommend watching all the videos to truly grasp the concepts presented.
“Everything is connected from the cosmological level to the quantum level.”
Similar to Stephen Hawking’s comment about Tide (detergent) in the trailer above, we’re about to discover some secrets that are right in front of our eyes. These secrets cover the cosmological level and quantum level, the visible and invisible, and the relationship between man and God.
First, a quick note about How to Write a Script Outline: the 8 major plot points (Scribe Meets World)
“Youcancreatethemostinterestingcharacter (humans) intheworld (universe),butwithoutanequallyinterestingplot,theaudiencewillnotwanttospend90-120minuteswiththatperson.Forexample,manypeoplefindCharlieSheen’scurrent2011self-destructivespiralinterestingtoreadandgossipabout.Butwouldtheywanttospendanhourandahalfoftheirliveswatchinghimswillalcohol,dodrugs,andooglewomen?Ithinknot.ButgiveCharlieboyagoal–perhapstorejoinTwo and aHalfMen,thesuccessfulsitcomhewaskickedoffof–whileheovercomeshisaddictiontoalcohol,drugs, and women…”
This is the same point I will emphasize. Moreover, I’ll highlight the major plot points to give a structure to this post. Finally, I’ll wrap up this take on the greatest script ever written with my view on the matter.
“It’s not a silent movie! The soundtrack is played on space itself…” – Janna Levin
Thepointofcommitmenthappensaroundpage60ofyourscreenplay. – Scribe Meets World
“…everything has a singularity at its center and so I thought everything was just a different size black hole.”
The SearchfortheFundamentalPattern brings us to plot point one.
In televisionandfilm,aplotpointisasignificanteventwithinaplotthat SPINS theactionaroundinanotherdirection.
The concept of “Nasty Infinities,” not quite Charlie Sheen spiraling out of control, however, are renormalized instead of being discarded. Planck’s distance, roughly equal to 1.6 x 10-35 m or about 10-20 times the size of a proton, gives us something to work with when dealing with the potential of the vacuum. This is fundamental to creation. If you put the number of these little dots in a centimeter cube of space (a vacuum) you’ll have a finite density for the vacuum fluctuation. Then you could calculate how much density, renormalized vacuum density, exists for the universe, galaxy, or atom. The real question is this: how did an infinite amount of energy divide and create subatomic particles? Maybe vacuum energy has structure and wasn’t random fluctuations but had a boundary fractal structure (geometric structure).
How do you describe it? Maybe everything in the universe is just a division of that energy density of the vacuum in various scales.
Elisabeth A. Rausher, Ph.D, physicist in collaboration with Nassim Haramein, present a Scaling Law (yet to be published) that uses the radius and frequency data points on the scale shown below. The data points represent universal size, galactic size, solar dynamics, interstellar dynamics, and crossing the boundary into atomic (from cosmological level to quantum level) level all the way to Planck’s constant with an obvious linear progression. Adding the biological resolution – the size of the sphere of our cells and their frequency level – brought them to discover the information feedback loop between the radiated side and the contracted side happens to fall exactly at the mid point!
Information doesn’t just flow into black holes but flows out as well – Nassim Haramein
The Midpoint: “You are the Event Horizon” the biological link (boundary) between the large and the small. Instead of seeing yourself as an insignificant dot in the universe, you start to see yourself as the center of creation. If you have come to these conclusions, you must have come to this conclusion finding out everyone else is the center of their universe as well and thus, we are all equal and we are all one.” – Nassim Haramein
It’s In Everyone of Us
“I’ve been realizing that, I bought this ticket and watching only half of the show.” “But there is scenery and lights and a cast of thousands…”
Plotpointtwoisaconflictingeventinthestorythatlaunchesthethirdact.WehavescientificevidencethatLIFEisnotbyaccidentandwhat’smore…thescriptwriterisinteractinginthe show similar to how anartistpaintsthemselvesintotheirartwork.
We have all heard about “Big Bang” theory which states, among other things, that the whole universe started out as an infinitely small point in space called a singularity and then “blew up” in a “massive explosion”, thereby creating space where there had been none before and space has been expanding ever since (at an ever accelerating rate, a process literally known as “inflation”). – Nassim Haramein
It’s in all of us… to be wise!
“Numbersixisasmallblackdot(hole)forexample,whichconvenientlysitsatthecenterofthenumbers1 through12.” – Daniel Tammet Notice that the number six is positioned in the center on the diagram of the Tree of Life.
“What about bigger numbers? Well, you can’t get bigger than Pi…(approximate fraction 22/7) the mathematical constant.” What about fluid dynamics… can it be found in art work as well?
The Unexpected Math Behind Van Gogh’s Starry Night
So far, we’ve covered the secrets of the cosmological level and quantum level, the visible and invisible, and now we’ll go into the relationship between man and God.
Pale Blue Dot – The Universe of Aristotle and Ptolemy
Have we lost hope for humanity? How can we put belief to the test?
God’s Sabbath (Epoch of Rest which we are currently in) explains why present-day science reveals only natural processes at work. Most biologist focus their research on the current era, whereas, if your research comes from the past as it does in astronomy, you’ll find the evidence for a personal God.
It’s not about design in the sense that all scientists admit in their research that we see overwhelming evidence for intelligent design. The real debate is who or what is responsible for the design we see in the universe, Earth, and its life. Is the scientific evidence for a creator shrinking or growing? The Bible states that God creates independent of space and time: “Singularity beginning” may be found in the books of Genesis. Psalm, Isaiah, Hebrews, John, and Col. The causal agent beyond space and time must be a personal being because only a personal being should demonstrate the attributes of intellect, knowledge, creativity, power, and care for his creation. This is not only acknowledged by those who take a Christian perspective, but it has been acknowledged by physicists and astronomers who take an atheistic perspective. – Hugh Ross
YOU have a ticket, and this spiral is worth watching through the whole show.
The more I examine the universe, the more evidence I find that the universe, in some sense, must have known we were coming. – Freeman Dyson, Disturbing the Universe, p.250
Discovery of extrasolar planets makes the coincidences of our planetary condition far less compelling evidence that the Earth was carefully designed just to please us humans. – Stephen Hawking, The Grand Design, p.153 (Extrasolar planets aren’t just right or finely tuned for LIFE)
Let’s talk about that constant in the universe…
Astronomers have developed nine independent observational demonstrations that show not only is the dark matter and energy real, it is the dominant component of the universe.
Space-Time Theorems: If the universe contains mass and general relativity reliably describes cosmic dynamics, then space and time must be created by a causal agent who transcends space and time.
Space-Time Theorems: Any universe that expands on average has a beginning in the past and must be created by a transcendent causal agent. – Borde, Vilenkin, Guth
Dark Energy: Arranging the universe as we think it is arranged would have required a miracle. …An external Agent (to space and time) intervened in cosmic history for reasons of its own. – Dyson, Kleban, and Susskind, Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant
Astrophysicist, Hugh Ross
“Themoreastronomerslearnabouttheuniversethe moreevidencetheyfindthattheconditionsnecessaryforlifeare farmorenumerousand farnarrowerthananyoneimagined.Duringourjourneybackintimewehaveexploredjustafewofover200finelytunedcharacteristicsneededinorderforanylifetoexistonanyplanet.Thisideaknowninastronomicalcirclestheentropicprincipledemonstratesthattheuniversehasbeencraftedforthebenefitofman.” – Hugh Ross
If you’vefollowedmywebsiteorblogfromthebeginningofmywritingjourney,thenyou’dhavenoticedthethemeofmy plots,poems,andpostsare all pieces of myTheoryofEverything.
Intheclimax,yourmaincharacterhasgatheredhisresources(bothinternal and external).Inthisfinalshowdown,hewilltesthismettleagainsttheantagonisticforcesthathavethwartedhimfromachievinghisgoal. Ifhehasatragicflaw,intheclimax,hedemonstratesthathehasovercomeit.Allthelessonshelearnedduringthesecondactwillpayoffintheclimax.–ScribeMeetsWorld
My final take: Scienceprovidesevidenceorelementsofacreator…ascript…andourabilitytowitnesstheeffectsinaction.Wecanseeintheuniversealltheuniquethingsthatneedtooccurtocreate LIFE,andthateachfractalmovementinwardandoutwardoccuratdifferentlevelswiththesameprecisionandaccuracy.Thehumanexperienceismeanttogivefeedbacktothe Creatorwiththeintentofeventuallyeliminatingallunwantedpartstocreateaneverlastingperfectuniverse. Characters in theuniverseplaytheir role aseachoneofusplaysourpartinthelargerschemeofthings.Allthesoul’sinformationwillcompletethe moving picturepixelbypixelto present a grand masterpiece.
The greatest script ever written is inscribed in the stars and beyond! It is His Story…
Director Elia Kazan talks about Brando’s performance in this classic drama romance:
“ … what was extraordinary about his performance, I feel, is the contrast of the tough-guy front and the extreme delicacy and gentle cast of his behavior. What other actor, when his brother draws a pistol to force him to do something shameful, would put his hand on the gun and push it away with the gentleness of a caress? Who else could read `Oh, Charley!’ in a tone of reproach that is so loving and so melancholy and suggests the terrific depth of pain?”
Kazan in A Life (biography), also states, “I was tasting vengeance that night and enjoying it. `On the Waterfront’ is my own story; every day I worked on that film, I was telling the world where I stood and my critics to go and – – – – themselves.”
“This classic story of Mob informers was based on a number of true stories and filmed on location in and around the docks of New York and New Jersey. Mob-connected union boss Johnny Friendly (Lee J. Cobb) rules the waterfront with an iron fist. The police know that he’s been responsible for a number of murders, but witnesses play deaf and dumb (“plead D & D”). Washed-up boxer Terry Malloy (Marlon Brando) has had an errand-boy job because of the influence of his brother Charley, a crooked union lawyer (Rod Steiger). Witnessing one of Friendly’s rub-outs, Terry is willing to keep his mouth shut until he meets the dead dockworker’s sister, Edie (Eva Marie Saint). “Waterfront priest” Father Barry (Karl Malden) tells Terry that Edie’s brother was killed because he was going to testify against boss Friendly before the crime commission. Terry feels somewhat responsible for the death. When Father Barry receives a beating from Friendly’s goons, Terry is persuaded to cooperate with the commission. Featuring Brando’s famous “I coulda been a contendah” speech, On the Waterfront has often been seen as an allegory of “naming names” against suspected Communists during the anti-Communist investigations of the 1950s. Director Elia Kazan famously informed on suspected Communists before a government committee — unlike many of his colleagues, some of whom went to prison for refusing to “name names” and many more of whom were blacklisted from working in the film industry for many years to come — and Budd Schulberg’s screenplay has often been read as an elaborate defense of the informer’s position. On the Waterfront won Oscars for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Actor for Brando, and Best Supporting Actress for Saint.” – Rotten Tomatoes
On the Waterfront was nominated for eleven Oscars and won eight. This film highlights a bold fight against corruption with unforgettable dialogue, and a riveting romance that keeps this 60-year-old film just as powerful and influential today as it was in 1954.
“Shut up about that conscience... That’s all I’ve been hearing about.” Marlon Brando delivers the crux of his character and of the film in his own unique style.
Marlon Brando is widely considered the greatest movie actor of all time, rivaled only by the more theatrically oriented Laurence Olivier in terms of esteem. Unlike Olivier, who preferred the stage to the screen, Brando concentrated his talents on movies after bidding the Broadway stage adieu in 1949, a decision for which he was severely criticized when his star began to dim in the 1960s and he was excoriated for squandering his talents. No actor ever exerted such a profound influence on succeeding generations of actors as did Brando. More than 50 years after he first scorched the screen as Stanley Kowalski in the movie version of Tennessee Williams‘ A Streetcar Named Desire(1951) and a quarter-century after his last great performance as Col. Kurtz in Francis Ford Coppola‘s Apocalypse Now (1979), all American actors are still being measured by the yardstick that was Brando. It was if the shadow of John Barrymore, the great American actor closest to Brando in terms of talent and stardom, dominated the acting field up until the 1970s. He did not, nor did any other actor so dominate the public’s consciousness of what WAS an actor before or since Brando’s 1951 on-screen portrayal of Stanley made him a cultural icon. Brando eclipsed the reputation of other great actors circa 1950, such as Paul Muni and Fredric March. Only the luster of Spencer Tracy‘s reputation hasn’t dimmed when seen in the starlight thrown off by Brando. However, neither Tracy nor Olivier created an entire school of acting just by the force of his personality. Brando did.
Born Marlon Brando Jr. on April 3, 1924, in Omaha, Nebraska, to Marlon Brando, Sr., a calcium carbonate salesman and his artistically inclined wife, the former Dorothy Pennebaker, “Bud” Brando was one of three children. His oldest sister Jocelyn Brando was also an actress, taking after their mother, who engaged in amateur theatricals and mentored a then-unknown Henry Fonda, another Nebraska native, in her role as director of the Omaha Community Playhouse. Frannie, Brando’s other sibling, was a visual artist. Both Brando sisters contrived to leave the Midwest for New York City, Jocelyn to study acting and Frannie to study art. Marlon managed to escape the vocational doldrums forecast for him by his cold, distant father and his disapproving schoolteachers by striking out for The Big Apple in 1943, following Jocelyn into the acting profession. Acting was the only thing he was good at, for which he received praise, so he was determined to make it his career – a high-school dropout, he had nothing else to fall back on, having been rejected by the military due to a knee injury he incurred playing football at Shattuck Military Academy, Brando Sr.’s alma mater. The school booted Marlon out as incorrigible before graduation. – Wikipedia
Eva Marie Saint: At 89, ‘You Have More To Give’
NPR’sScottSimontalkswiththe89-year-oldmovielegend in link below.Inhonorofits60thanniversary,theAcademyofMotionPictureArtsandScienceswillscreenOntheWaterfrontonJune6,2014 in LosAngeles. The notion of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) began with Louis B. Mayer, head of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM). He wanted to create an organization that would mediate labor disputes and improve the industry’s image. So, on a Sunday evening, Mayer and three other studio big-wigs – actor Conrad Nagel, director Fred Niblo, and the head of the Association of Motion Picture Producers, Fred Beetson – sat down and discussed these matters. The idea of this elite club having an annual banquet was tossed around, but there was no mention of awards just yet. They also established that membership into the organization would only be open to people involved in one of the five branches of the industry: actors, directors, writers, technicians, and producers. (Formation May 11, 1927)
She played two of the most famous female leads in movie history. Born in New Jersey July 4, 1924, Eva Marie Saint graduated from Bowling Green State University in 1946 and spent the first seven years of her acting career working in the Golden Age of television. She made the leap to the big screen in 1954 with an Oscar-winning performance as Edie Doyle in Elia Kazan‘s masterpiece On the Waterfront (1954). She certainly brought “real acting” to a time when melodrama still ran rampant in the industry. Who can forget her memorable argument scene with Marlon Brando when she says, “I didn’t say I don’t love you, I said I want you to get out”? Five years later, she starred as Eve Kendell, the sultry spy in Alfred Hitchcock‘s North by Northwest (1959) opposite Cary Grant. The change in her screen persona, coupled with her adroit performance as a seductive woman of mystery who keeps Grant (and the audience) off-balance, was widely heralded. A suspense classic, “North by Northwest” is now considered one of the greatest films ever made. Eva Marie also received Golden Globe and BAFTA nominations for A Hatful of Rain (1957) and won an Emmy Award for the miniseries People Like Us(1990). As of late, she has been seen in the family film Because of Winn-Dixie (2005) and the action adventure Superman Returns (2006), where she played Martha Kent. Eva Marie Saint is still going strong with her work and takes the fact that she’s part of film history in her stride.
Got the part of Edie Doyle in On the Waterfront (1954) over Elizabeth Montgomery. Director Elia Kazan, in his autobiography “A Life,” says that the choice of an actress to play the part was narrowed down to Montgomery and Saint, but there were also some qualms about Saint playing a teenager, since she was 30 years old at the time. Although Montgomery was fine in her screen test, there was an air of finishing school about her. Kazan thought this genteel quality would not be becoming for Edie, who was raised on the waterfront in Hoboken, New Jersey. He gave the part to Saint, and she went on to win cinematic immortality, and a Best Supporting Actress Oscar, in the part. – Wikipedia
On the Waterfront is just as powerful and influential today as it was in 1954 because it speaks to our current political and criminal situation. From large corporate organizations to government agencies, the common man is sick of the corruption. He is examining his conscience and finding no other way… but exposing the criminal actions.
A whistleblower (whistle-blower or whistle blower) is a person who exposes misconduct, alleged dishonest or illegal activity occurring in an organization. The alleged misconduct may be classified in many ways; for example, a violation of a law, rule, regulation and/or a direct threat to public interest, such as fraud, health and safety violations, and corruption. Whistleblowers may make their allegations internally (for example, to other people within the accused organization) or externally (to regulators, law enforcement agencies, to the media or to groups concerned with the issues).
The Continental Congress enacted the first whistleblower protection law in the United States on July 30, 1778 by a unanimous vote. The Continental Congress was moved to act after an incident in 1777, when Richard Marven and Samuel Shaw blew the whistle and suffered severe retaliation by Esek Hopkins, the commander-in-chief of the Continental Navy. Congress declared that the United States would defend the two whistleblowers against a libel suit filed against them by Hopkins. The Continental Congress also declared it the duty of “all persons in the service of the United States, as well as all other the inhabitants thereof” to inform the Continental Congress or proper authorities of “misconduct, frauds or misdemeanors committed by any officers in the service of these states, which may come to their knowledge.” – Wikipedia
Conscience is an aptitude, faculty, intuition or judgment that assists in distinguishing right from wrong. Moral judgment may derive from values or norms (principles and rules). In psychological terms conscience is often described as leading to feelings of remorse when a human commits actions that go against his/her moral values and to feelings of rectitude or integrity when actions conform to such norms. The extent to which conscience informs moral judgment before an action and whether such moral judgments are or should be based in reason has occasioned debate through much of the history of Western philosophy.- Wikipedia
This Western philosophy is eloquently expressed in On the Waterfront. We may discover the deeper aspects of this powerful film when reviewing the relevant points found in Cicero’s Teaching on Natural Law by Thomas G. West. (St. John’s Review, Summer 1981. Vol. 32)
We are in the midst of a crisis – not always evident in the comfortable lives we lead, but a crisis nonetheless. A sign of the crisis is the ongoing political collapse of the West; the liberal democracies of America and Europe are barely willing to defend themselves against the insolence of petty tyrants and the armed imperialism of the Soviet Union. Why this somnolent slide into voluntary weakness? Because we are not convinced that we have anything to fight for. We are ready to believe the worst of ourselves, and the best of our adversaries, because we no longer fully believe that we deserve to survive. That is because we no longer know what the West is, and why its preservation matters for nurturing and sustaining the noblest and best of human activities. In particular, we in America no longer know why the United States is the best hope for the modern world.
“Marcus Tullius Cicero was a Roman philosopher, politician, lawyer, orator, political theorist, consul and constitutionalist. His works rank among the most influential in European culture, and today still constitute one of the most important bodies of primary material for the writing and revision of Roman history.” -Wikipedia
Why is this important?
Cicero, or rather Roman philosophy generally, represents for Heidegger an important stage in the gradual forgetting of the Greek discovery of nature, a forgetting process which has marked the whole history of the West. According to Heidegger, the very translation of Greek philosophy into Latin effaced that insight. Roman philosophy conceived natura, the nature of things, as present-at-hand and readily available to easy philosophic contemplation and the formulation of ethical doctrines. It thereby failed to renew the vibrant amplitude of the Greek physis, which embraces the emergence and coming-to-be of things no less than their distinct standing-forth in full presence before the mind’s eye. The Roman narrowing of nature therefore prepared the way for the modern view of beings as mere disposable resources, easily accessible to human projects and manipulation.
…By tremendous efforts Greek philosophy had achieved its insight into the distinction between and yet necessary belonging-together of nature and convention, being and appearance, truth and opinion, an insight anticipated in the dark lyrics of the pre-Socratic thinkers and given its consummate expression in the works of Plato and Aristotle. But now, in the moribund Roman republic, this grasp upon the tense unity of nature and convention was forgotten by politicians unformed by philosophy and philosophers disdainful of politics. …Cicero strove to reyoke the sundered pair.
Poetry and law (law taken in a wide sense, like the Greek nomos, to include custom and tradition) appear immortalize the transient or even to bring non-being into being by touching our minds and memories through words. If philosophy, which strives uncompromisingly to unveil the true nature of things, is the antithesis of poetry, it would likewise seem to be the enemy of the traditions and beliefs on which law depends and which in some measure law is. The beginning of Cicero’s laws unobtrusively questions whether law contains any truth whatever. Law, like poetry, may be nothing more than a fiction that furnishes pleasure by establishing trust in eternally binding precepts and practices. Cicero forestalls this positivist inference by drawing a distinction between two senses of the word law: the popular sense, according to which law is “that which sanctions in writing whatever it wishes, either by commanding or prohibiting,” and the more learned sense, derived from nature itself, according to which law is “the mind and reason of the prudent man.”
…Law is natural in the same way that reason is natural, as a gift of nature bestowed on every human being. But only in the prudent man, whose reason is developed as far as it can be, does reason become “correct,” and so only his commands and prohibitions are truly “law.” …Even if complete knowledge of good is unavailable, as Cicero’s skeptism implies, we may infer that an approximation to wisdom is accessible through the assiduous exercise of understanding. Cicero’s final peroration to Book I paints a picture of perfect wisdom that can be a standard, even if unattained, of human striving. Self-knowledge is the key. For once we learn that we are equipped by nature for acquiring wisdom, and we sense that the mind, as sort of image of the gods, is worthy of care and cultivation.
I know you feel these are the worst of times…
Rumor has it… its the end of paradise.
Today’s headlines read… corruption, fraud, greed …and of whistle blowers around the world coming forward to expose the corruption within corporations as well as governments. Doom and gloom are the buzz word of our day! There is much to learn from the classics. Eva Marie Saint said it well, “You have more to give!”
Terry (Marlon Brando) as well as Elia Kazan (Director) learns exactly what they are capable of doing through the process of self-knowledge. Both the common man and the man of status or wealth are enticed by the “Roman Philosophy.” And both must examine himself to make a reasonable decision on how to act as demonstrated by this film and the filmmaker.
Symphonic Suite – On the Waterfront
Leonard Bernstein (August 25, 1918 — October 14, 1990) was an American conductor, composer, author, music lecturer and pianist. He was among the first conductors born and educated in the United States of America to receive worldwide acclaim. According to The New York Times, he was “one of the most prodigiously talented and successful musicians in American history.”
I highly recommend all serious screenwriters study this film. I’ll be studying this masterpiece as I re-write Peace Lily.
Rookie FBI agent Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster) is assigned to get into the mind of notorious incarcerated serial killer Dr Hannibal ‘the Cannibal’ Lecter (Anthony Hopkins). Her job is to get his evaluation on the elusive Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine), a serial killer who’s been abducting and killing young women. When a prominent senator’s daughter is kidnapped, it becomes a race against time to find her before she is killed. FBI agent Jack Crawford (Scott Glenn) believes that Dr. Lecter holds vital information for the case and he is willing to sacrifice Starling to catch Buffalo Bill before he kills again.
This thriller dominated the 1991 academy awards by winning Best Actor, Actress, Director, Film and adapted screenplay. Only three films have won all five major categories: It Happened One Night (1934), One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975), and The Silence of The Lambs (1991).
Let’s first define psychological thriller before dissecting The Silence of The Lambs.
A psychological thriller is a fictional thriller story which emphasizes the psychology of its characters and their unstable emotional states. In terms of classification, the category is a sub-genre of the broader ranging thriller category, with similarities to Gothic and detective fiction in the sense of sometimes having a “dissolving sense of reality,” moral ambiguity, and complex and tortured relationships between obsessive and pathological characters. Psychological thrillers often incorporate elements of mystery, drama, and horror, particularly psychological horror. -Wikipedia
WARNING: Viewer discretion is advised.
The unique aspect of The Silence of The Lambs is you’re seductively drawn into the characters and mesmerized by the horror perpetrated before you. Many psychological thrillers propel the audience to look away from the screen. The above entrance scene sets the tone, and the masterful point of view (POV) shots hook your innermost being. The title The Silence of The Lambs eloquently expresses the loss of innocence portrayed in the film.
A “loss of innocence” is a common theme in fiction, pop culture, and realism. It is often seen as an integral part of coming of age. It is usually thought of as an experience or period in a child’s life that widens their awareness of evil, pain or suffering in the world around them. -Wikipedia
We see this theme in the story of Adam and Eve where the fall from the state of innocence formed the present world of suffering and injustice. The Serpent or Seraphim deceives a naive Eve and thus begins the loss of innocence. Although not exclusive to Christianity, the fear of being vulnerable and deceived is arguably a human condition. Don’t we unconsciously worry something nonhuman is leading the sheeple to slaughter?
Dr. Hannibal Lector’s senses and intellect demonstrate his super-human characteristics. Agent Starling is willing to subject herself to Lector’s sharp mind and interrogation to set the captive young woman free. Many of us share a passionate desire to stop the screaming of the lambs or the injustices we see in our world.
Our generation is “coming of age.” We are confronted daily with revelations of fraud and deception in finance, government, education, history, religion, etc. Check out the anticipated new release The Wolf of Wall Street which highlights this reality. Sometimes it is hard to distinguish the dreamworld from reality when topics like aliens, UFO’s, or long held conspiracy theories are presented as real possibilities on History channel’s H2 “More to History” television series.
Psychological horror aims to create discomfort by exposing universal psychological and emotional vulnerabilities and fears; such as the shadowy parts of the human psyche that most people repress or deny. Psychological horror films differ from the traditional horror film, where the source of the fear is typically something material – such as creatures, monsters or aliens – as well as the splatter film, which derives its effects from gore and graphic violence, in that tension is built through atmosphere, eerie sounds and exploitation of the viewer’s and the character’s psychological fears. The line between dreamed threats and real threats are often blurred. -Wikipedia
Buffalo Bill scene dancing:
The Killers – Are we human or are we dancers?
The psychological horror is a fictional story. We must remember the human psyche has a tendency to be mesmerized with dark places. We may be entertained by the magic of holly wood for a brief time; but the light of love and awareness will set the captive free.
666 Park Avenue is an American supernatural drama series, which premiered on ABC on September 30, 2012. The series was created and produced by David Wilcox, and was loosely based upon the novel of the same name by Gabriella Pierce. The show stars Rachael Taylor, Dave Annable, Vanessa Williams and Terry O’Quinn and follows a couple who learns that the Manhattan apartment building that they just moved into, including its upscale tenants, might be possessed by a mysterious demonic force.
The Plot – 666 Park Avenue focuses on Jane Van Veen (Rachael Taylor) and her partner Henry Martin (Dave Annable), the new co-managers of the Drake residential hotel, located at 999 Park Avenue. The Drake is owned by mysterious Billionaire Gavin Doran (Terry O’Quinn) and his wife Olivia (Vanessa Williams). The plot follows both Jane and Henry, and the other residents of the Drake who live in the shadow of the dark supernatural forces of the Drake and its owner.
On December 21, 2012, ABC announced that the final four episodes of 666 Park Avenue would air the following summer. The final episodes were first broadcast in Spain, and have also since aired in New Zealand and the United Kingdom, ahead of their original airing on ABC. The series finale aired in the United Kingdom on 14 May 2013. -Wikipedia
This is good news for die-hard fans. Unlike some series, the unaired episodes will finish in America this summer alongside ‘Zero Hour.’ A question which still lingers in our minds is what caused the sudden demise.
Let’s delve into the elements that comprise a Supernatural Drama.
According to Wikipedia, supernatural drama is a sub-genre of fantasy combining elements of supernatural fiction and the drama genre. This genre deal with ghosts and other paranormal topics, but without the tone and scares associated with the horror genre. The story lines of supernatural dramas have always been centered on magic or unexplained phenomena that cannot be rationalized by science but, rather by pagan or supernatural explanations. Supernatural dramas may use creatures of folklore that are displayed as neutral or evil rather than creatures of fantasy, which are perceived as good natured (such as fairies, leprechauns, or elves).
The beings usually seen in supernatural dramas, or rather just the genre of supernatural itself, are apparitions, spirits, witches, warlocks, super humans, demons, gods, angels and miracles (although they are not like miracles of fantasy or divine intervention of god/s) and other similar ideas or depictions of extraordinary phenomena. They may be combined with other genres, including comedy, action, science fiction, fantasy and/or horror. However, until recently, supernatural works were usually presented in a comical, whimsical, or a romantic fashion, and were not designed to frighten the audience. There are also many hybrids that have combinations of fantasy, action, horror, romance and comedy.
So how did 666 Park Avenue rate?
Mark Wilson, About.com Guide, November 19, 2012, says, “The reviews were pretty mixed, which is oddly apt: the show itself comes across as a uneven amalgamation of lush ambiance and very mild horror. The main problem seems to be that 666 Park has played it too safe. If only it had had the courage to be a little shocking.”
In my opinion, the drama was too shocking to the psyche and evoked an aversion to the Beast (666) hidden in the basement of the Park Avenue hotel. 666 Park Avenue bypassed the popular fantasy images and touched the core of our being. The spiraling staircase takes us into the dark hidden subconscious which holds many secrets from the past that inevitably control the present. The powerful grasps of seductive temptations are demonstrated in the location Park Avenue and all its trappings. The horror of this subtle evil is well spoken in the lyrics of Hotel California “you can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave.”
Mirrors on the ceiling,
The pink champagne on ice
And she said ‘we are all just prisoners here, of our own device’
And in the master’s chambers,
They gathered for the feast
They stab it with their steely knives,
But they just can’t kill the beast
Last thing I remember, I was
Running for the door
I had to find the passage back
To the place I was before
‘relax,’ said the night man,
We are programmed to receive.
You can checkout any time you like,
But you can never leave!
Are we all just lost souls possessed by demonic forces?
When we learn the truth hidden in the recesses of our subconscious will we succumb to the dark evil side within us and forever stay trapped in the lower self? Are we all just prisoners here, of our own device? I believe the lesson, teaches us it’s only a program…a story….and a temptation. The element of horror in this supernatural drama presents us with our own personal devil.
-3rd dog aka Betsy Banfield-Malone
Now Accepting Bitcoin Donations for “Peace Lily Project” by 3rd Dog Script
Project goal – 100% funding from script to screen
Send Bitcoin Donations to: 1BaeAahBwbDh6FGUhgnVq5JraXP8uPn4nN
…is in honor and memory of Tessa, my petite Maltese born October 6, 1993 and passed away September 18, 2009.
I was considered the 3rd dog in Tessa’s pack. Her first master was first dog, Tessa was second dog and I was third dog. No matter what I’d do to gain respect or position in Tessa’s eyes… I was “third dog.” She was so adorable and such a character, I caved to her demands…and she was very demanding…which brought me joy and contentment. Her demands…were begging for food and sitting on my lap.
Tessa had a few quirky personality traits based on her past…growing up in a less than ideal environment…thrown into the backyard with two Dobermans to fend for herself. She was about 3 pounds at that time…the runt…and a spitfire. Not far from being a replica of me….she made me smile with joy at her attitude.
Quite the problem solver…
She also liked mischief and got herself into some very serious problems. Like the time she discovered chocolate candy on the coffee table and laid in wait for her moment to snatch the candy bars…run upstairs…and hide them under the bed until nightfall. In the middle of the night…I awoke to a banging noise. It was Tessa banging her water bowl against the metal stairs to get my attention. I soon discovered several empty candy wrappers, piles of vomit everywhere, and Tessa banging the bowl. Unbelievable that she survived that terrible episode…eating more candy bars than I could… at one time!
Filled with inspiration…
She will always be my inspiration and a reminder of perfection.
As I emerged in the second half of my journey as a storyteller, launched myself into the world of screenwriting, and left behind a totally different phase of my life, I also had to let go of my friend…my companion…my little spitfire…Tessa.