In his shocking new film, Dinesh D’Souza exposes the secret history of the Democrats and the true motivations of Hillary before the election this year.
There’s more to the story!
3rd Dog Script’s screenplay Peace Lily exposesthe secret history of the deplorable culture at the Department of Veterans Affairs and how the Clinton’s established this culture. It’s no “mis-take” both are being exposed in the media today. This post is for all those individuals suffering with PTSD from exposure to the Clinton culture or what I’ll label spiritual Agent Orange.
President William J. Clinton
Establishing shots – Peace Lily
An establishing shot in filmmaking and television production sets up, or establishes the context for a scene by showing the relationship between its important figures and objects.
Establishing shots were more common during the classical era of filmmaking than they are now. Today’s filmmakers tend to skip the establishing shot in order to move the scene along more quickly. – Wikipedia
INT. LOBBY – DAY
A security GUARD wears a sloppy uniform, bad attitude, and stands next to a dilapidated metal detector. A large picture… VA emblem.
ON THE WALL: President Clinton
Sophia stands inside metal detector.
Walk through the metal detector.
Sophia steps beyond the metal detector.
The Guard slowly moves a WAND up and down her body.
The guard presses a button and wand BEEPS and FLASHES RED. It hovers over Sophia’s butt for several beats.
Do you have any weapons on you?
I need to pat you down.
No! I don’t have a weapon. Why?
He touches the sides of her breast and then caresses her butt.
Seats filled with VETERANS appalled. The guard’s eyes are fixed on Sophia.
I used the classic style in the establishing scene/shot for Peace Lily because it represents the Golden thread in the script. The context or the relationship between the important figure, President Clinton, and the object, Department of Veterans Affairs (a government agency), is to demonstrate how often subordinates are easily influenced by and follow their leader’s behavior. I couldn’t follow the leaders’ behavior and found it quite difficult to watch my best friend subjected to the deplorable actions of the weak individuals who chose to go down the low road of sexual harassment, corruption, and destructive behaviors. I chose to transform the negative into a positive with creative action.
We need to discuss all base people who are in a position of power such as Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton. Let’s all be victors and not victims to base behaviors displayed and perpetrated by BOTH sexes and openly expose their crimes. It was impossible for women harmed by Bill Clinton’s actions to fight Hillary Clinton’s power grab. When a woman who’s considered powerful supports an abusive man, the female victim is discredited. One of my characters in Peace Lilly, was a bad woman, who displayed her desire for promotion by lying on women who were victimized by male leaders. She was promoted and she herself promoted a hostile environment against women. She was #withherself just as Hillary Clinton’s campaign tagline displays this selfishness -#Imwithher. In contrast, Donald Trump, a business man, has chosen to rise to the occasion and take a leadership position. Yes, women leaders who go against other women who are victims of sexual harassment prove to be all about themselves and set a precedent for the rest of the world to abuse women too. My screenplay shows that women who support horrible crimes against other women may get the power grab they sell out for in the short time, but in the long run, they go to jail.
“A General Lack of Care” is another line on the Golden thread within Peace Lily which waswritten from my diary of events experienced at the Department of Veterans Affairs from 1991 to 2003.
In this classic coming-of-age and underdog story the innocent but stubborn heroine confronts evil in many hilarious scenes to eventually conquer the bad guys. Problems occur when the villain feels threatened by Sophia’s knowledge of his corruption. He and his cohorts try to get rid of Sophia by any means. In the end, the heroine wins by exposing the truth.
The blatant hypocrisy in claiming to serve veterans while stealing funds, ignoring and destroying veterans claims, and not caring if veterans die waiting for care led me to believe VA leaders did not think they would suffer any consequences for their actions. That’s when I started looking into the President’s actions and his wife, Hillary Clinton. It is common for people to follow their leader’s behavior as most people admire leaders. While searching beyond the headline news about Monica Lewinsky, I found all manner of corruption. To grasp the details on what type of corruption, hypocrisy, and connections to government agencies, one only needs to watch the news, documentaries, or read the constant leaks coming out on both Bill and Hillary Clinton. I personally watched the Clinton culture ignite inside the Department of Veterans Affairs and grow as if that agency were too big to fail like the banks. The leaders at Department of Veterans Affairs copied the actions of the Clintons.
For those individuals suffering with PTSD from exposure to Clinton culture the best treatment is to transform the negative into a positive by doing something productive to stop the madness. Be creative!
Won Empire Award UK 2007 Best Director, Christopher Nolan; Italian Online Movie Award (IOMA) 2007 Best Adapted Screenplay, Christopher Nolan, Johathan Nolan; London Critics Circle Film Award 2007 British supporting actor of the year Michael Caine; Satellite Award Best Overall DVD; SFX Award UK 2007 Best Film Director, Christopher Nolan.
When the Academy Awards are given out each year, there are two awards for screenplays. One is for best original screenplay, which is a screenplay that is written from no source other than the writer’s imagination. The other category is reserved for the best adapted screenplay. Generally, this is a screenplay that interprets another source, like a novel, a short story, a play, or even another film.
The novel The Prestige is epistolary in structure; that is, it purports to be a collection of real diaries (that’s why I like this adapted screenplay) that were kept by the protagonists and later collated. The title derives from the novel’s fictional practice of stage illusions having three parts: the setup, the performance (the turn in the film), and the prestige (effect).
“By the end of the 1890s, Tesla had come to the conclusion that it might be possible to transmit electrical power without wires at high altitudes. There the air was thinner, and therefore more conductive.” PBS: Telsa – Master of Light http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_colspr.html
“The real transported man is the most sought after illusion.” – Cutter, Michael Caine
A spinning, whirling, or twisting force… a fundamental concept of existence.
“Every magic trick consists of three acts: the magician shows you something ordinary… perhaps he asks you to inspect it to make sure it is real. In the second act, the turn, the magician takes that something ordinary and makes it do something extraordinary. Now, you are looking at the secret… but you won’t find it because you don’t really want to know. You won’t even clap because the magician needs to bring it back! The hardest part, the third act, is the prestige when you bring back the pledge.” – Cutter, Michael Caine
“This is the line that Nolan wants to walk… He wants to be immersive and metacinematic at the same time. In other words, he wants to hide in plain sight (site). The prestige is all about a trick that moves its object through time and space instantaneously.” – The Nerdwriter
While the plot supports the story, its the subplot that supports the theme of the script. The adapted screenplay – The Prestige – has crafted the subplot to support the theme derived from a collection of real diaries which also document Tesla’s inventions. Did Tesla the “Master of Light” create the most sought after illusion; the transported man? For my prestige, I bring back the pledge… the mystery… and reveal the secret. file:///C:/Users/peter/Downloads/p-teleport.pdf
American Comedy Series (no spoilers in this Lucifer review 3rd Dog)
Lucifer, as you may have already guessed, follows Lucifer Morningstar (Tom Ellis), who has escaped Hell in order to have a little fun on earth running a nightclub and playing with the lives of mere mortals. He’s apparently been doing this for a while when one of his so-called projects gets murdered, leading him to meet Detective Chloe Dancer (Chicago Fire’s Lauren German). Since Lucifer is the literal devil, he’s great at convincing people to respond to questions they might not normally otherwise be willing to answer. This trickery leads to plenty of light-spirited comedy during the hour-long drama. It also leads Lucifer to become a very helpful police consultant.
The series, created by Tom Kapinos, plays on the notion that Lucifer Morningstar might not be all bad, that God sent him down to Hell as the best option to take care of the souls who reside there. But it’s safe to say that Lucifer has some daddy issues, making him an even more complex character than you would expect from this sort of show. Fox actually does a lot to expand upon the basic procedural elements with Lucifer, introducing characters like psychologist Linda (Suits’ Rachael Harris), who help Lucifer delve into who he is and why he is on Earth. – Cinemablend
The sly FOX, Tom Ellis, who plays Lucifer in this unique buddy cop show brings a new level to antihero. The term antihero was first used as early as 1714 and the concept has also been identified in classical Greek drama, Roman satire, and Renaissance literature.
Still, Lucifer seems to be operating without much purpose – other than sheer debauchery – when Detective Chloe Decker (Lauren German) enters the scene, seeking to solve a murder that took place outside the club. Moreover, Chloe appears to be immune to Lucifer’s influence (one is tempted to invoke the image of Jedi mind tricks), which intrigues him, as he tags along in helping her to decipher what happened. – Variety
I totally disagree with Variety’s take on Lucifer. What images do you conjure up when you here All Hell Broke Loose? You’ll notice there’s more than British charm going on in the dialogue. Pandemonium could look like there’s no purpose, however, therein LIES the Tale.
You’ll discover what’s behind the genius of Stephen Hawking in this 2014 British biographical coming-of-age romantic drama film.
Bottom Line: Love makes the world go-round…with a big bang.
“There should be no boundary to human endeavor. However bad life may seem where there is life there is hope.” – Stephen Hawking
Stephen’s black hole theory actually led him to an even greater realization… life is unique and love truly conquers all. “Look at what we’ve made!” – Stephen Hawking
In script writing, you’ll find that every scriptwriter wants to have a brilliant line like this one to sum up the grand endeavor.
Stephen’s personal script went beyond the ordinary. His particle or particular view will lead the universal consciousness to discover His Story. I give the film five stars, a raving review, and strongly recommend watching it.
Personally, I was captivated by the scenes of Stephen’s physical struggles of which I can unequivocally relate, and the desire to mentally reach beyond the stars, and the gentle nature that yearns to embrace love in its finest hour. Furthermore, speaking of my particular view, I’m compelled to post my theory of everything – His Story (history).
Let me explain my theory, which is summed up in this line: The greatest script ever written is inscribed in the stars and beyond!
WARNING: Stop here, if you don’t want to go down the black hole. Please understand, it will take some TIME to tell this tale.
If you’re ready to leap beyond the horizon into empty space… then follow along… as we move from theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking’s black hole to physicist Nassim Haramein’s black whole.
“What happened at the beginning of time?” “Wind back the clock!” “The universe was born from a black hole?” – Hawking
“What unifies everything everywhere?” “…were these ancient civilizations from all points across the globe leaving us detailed information about the fundamental physics of creation?” “…scientific evidence that everything is one.” – Haramein
You’ll discover the plot points as we move from Nassim Haramein’s documentary, The Connected Universe, to astrophysicist Hugh Ross’ Journey Toward Creation. I recommend watching all the videos to truly grasp the concepts presented.
“Everything is connected from the cosmological level to the quantum level.”
Similar to Stephen Hawking’s comment about Tide (detergent) in the trailer above, we’re about to discover some secrets that are right in front of our eyes. These secrets cover the cosmological level and quantum level, the visible and invisible, and the relationship between man and God.
First, a quick note about How to Write a Script Outline: the 8 major plot points (Scribe Meets World)
“Youcancreatethemostinterestingcharacter (humans) intheworld (universe),butwithoutanequallyinterestingplot,theaudiencewillnotwanttospend90-120minuteswiththatperson.Forexample,manypeoplefindCharlieSheen’scurrent2011self-destructivespiralinterestingtoreadandgossipabout.Butwouldtheywanttospendanhourandahalfoftheirliveswatchinghimswillalcohol,dodrugs,andooglewomen?Ithinknot.ButgiveCharlieboyagoal–perhapstorejoinTwo and aHalfMen,thesuccessfulsitcomhewaskickedoffof–whileheovercomeshisaddictiontoalcohol,drugs, and women…”
This is the same point I will emphasize. Moreover, I’ll highlight the major plot points to give a structure to this post. Finally, I’ll wrap up this take on the greatest script ever written with my view on the matter.
“It’s not a silent movie! The soundtrack is played on space itself…” – Janna Levin
Thepointofcommitmenthappensaroundpage60ofyourscreenplay. – Scribe Meets World
“…everything has a singularity at its center and so I thought everything was just a different size black hole.”
The SearchfortheFundamentalPattern brings us to plot point one.
In televisionandfilm,aplotpointisasignificanteventwithinaplotthat SPINS theactionaroundinanotherdirection.
The concept of “Nasty Infinities,” not quite Charlie Sheen spiraling out of control, however, are renormalized instead of being discarded. Planck’s distance, roughly equal to 1.6 x 10-35 m or about 10-20 times the size of a proton, gives us something to work with when dealing with the potential of the vacuum. This is fundamental to creation. If you put the number of these little dots in a centimeter cube of space (a vacuum) you’ll have a finite density for the vacuum fluctuation. Then you could calculate how much density, renormalized vacuum density, exists for the universe, galaxy, or atom. The real question is this: how did an infinite amount of energy divide and create subatomic particles? Maybe vacuum energy has structure and wasn’t random fluctuations but had a boundary fractal structure (geometric structure).
How do you describe it? Maybe everything in the universe is just a division of that energy density of the vacuum in various scales.
Elisabeth A. Rausher, Ph.D, physicist in collaboration with Nassim Haramein, present a Scaling Law (yet to be published) that uses the radius and frequency data points on the scale shown below. The data points represent universal size, galactic size, solar dynamics, interstellar dynamics, and crossing the boundary into atomic (from cosmological level to quantum level) level all the way to Planck’s constant with an obvious linear progression. Adding the biological resolution – the size of the sphere of our cells and their frequency level – brought them to discover the information feedback loop between the radiated side and the contracted side happens to fall exactly at the mid point!
Information doesn’t just flow into black holes but flows out as well – Nassim Haramein
The Midpoint: “You are the Event Horizon” the biological link (boundary) between the large and the small. Instead of seeing yourself as an insignificant dot in the universe, you start to see yourself as the center of creation. If you have come to these conclusions, you must have come to this conclusion finding out everyone else is the center of their universe as well and thus, we are all equal and we are all one.” – Nassim Haramein
It’s In Everyone of Us
“I’ve been realizing that, I bought this ticket and watching only half of the show.” “But there is scenery and lights and a cast of thousands…”
Plotpointtwoisaconflictingeventinthestorythatlaunchesthethirdact.WehavescientificevidencethatLIFEisnotbyaccidentandwhat’smore…thescriptwriterisinteractinginthe show similar to how anartistpaintsthemselvesintotheirartwork.
We have all heard about “Big Bang” theory which states, among other things, that the whole universe started out as an infinitely small point in space called a singularity and then “blew up” in a “massive explosion”, thereby creating space where there had been none before and space has been expanding ever since (at an ever accelerating rate, a process literally known as “inflation”). – Nassim Haramein
It’s in all of us… to be wise!
“Numbersixisasmallblackdot(hole)forexample,whichconvenientlysitsatthecenterofthenumbers1 through12.” – Daniel Tammet Notice that the number six is positioned in the center on the diagram of the Tree of Life.
“What about bigger numbers? Well, you can’t get bigger than Pi…(approximate fraction 22/7) the mathematical constant.” What about fluid dynamics… can it be found in art work as well?
The Unexpected Math Behind Van Gogh’s Starry Night
So far, we’ve covered the secrets of the cosmological level and quantum level, the visible and invisible, and now we’ll go into the relationship between man and God.
Pale Blue Dot – The Universe of Aristotle and Ptolemy
Have we lost hope for humanity? How can we put belief to the test?
God’s Sabbath (Epoch of Rest which we are currently in) explains why present-day science reveals only natural processes at work. Most biologist focus their research on the current era, whereas, if your research comes from the past as it does in astronomy, you’ll find the evidence for a personal God.
It’s not about design in the sense that all scientists admit in their research that we see overwhelming evidence for intelligent design. The real debate is who or what is responsible for the design we see in the universe, Earth, and its life. Is the scientific evidence for a creator shrinking or growing? The Bible states that God creates independent of space and time: “Singularity beginning” may be found in the books of Genesis. Psalm, Isaiah, Hebrews, John, and Col. The causal agent beyond space and time must be a personal being because only a personal being should demonstrate the attributes of intellect, knowledge, creativity, power, and care for his creation. This is not only acknowledged by those who take a Christian perspective, but it has been acknowledged by physicists and astronomers who take an atheistic perspective. – Hugh Ross
YOU have a ticket, and this spiral is worth watching through the whole show.
The more I examine the universe, the more evidence I find that the universe, in some sense, must have known we were coming. – Freeman Dyson, Disturbing the Universe, p.250
Discovery of extrasolar planets makes the coincidences of our planetary condition far less compelling evidence that the Earth was carefully designed just to please us humans. – Stephen Hawking, The Grand Design, p.153 (Extrasolar planets aren’t just right or finely tuned for LIFE)
Let’s talk about that constant in the universe…
Astronomers have developed nine independent observational demonstrations that show not only is the dark matter and energy real, it is the dominant component of the universe.
Space-Time Theorems: If the universe contains mass and general relativity reliably describes cosmic dynamics, then space and time must be created by a causal agent who transcends space and time.
Space-Time Theorems: Any universe that expands on average has a beginning in the past and must be created by a transcendent causal agent. – Borde, Vilenkin, Guth
Dark Energy: Arranging the universe as we think it is arranged would have required a miracle. …An external Agent (to space and time) intervened in cosmic history for reasons of its own. – Dyson, Kleban, and Susskind, Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant
Astrophysicist, Hugh Ross
“Themoreastronomerslearnabouttheuniversethe moreevidencetheyfindthattheconditionsnecessaryforlifeare farmorenumerousand farnarrowerthananyoneimagined.Duringourjourneybackintimewehaveexploredjustafewofover200finelytunedcharacteristicsneededinorderforanylifetoexistonanyplanet.Thisideaknowninastronomicalcirclestheentropicprincipledemonstratesthattheuniversehasbeencraftedforthebenefitofman.” – Hugh Ross
If you’vefollowedmywebsiteorblogfromthebeginningofmywritingjourney,thenyou’dhavenoticedthethemeofmy plots,poems,andpostsare all pieces of myTheoryofEverything.
Intheclimax,yourmaincharacterhasgatheredhisresources(bothinternal and external).Inthisfinalshowdown,hewilltesthismettleagainsttheantagonisticforcesthathavethwartedhimfromachievinghisgoal. Ifhehasatragicflaw,intheclimax,hedemonstratesthathehasovercomeit.Allthelessonshelearnedduringthesecondactwillpayoffintheclimax.–ScribeMeetsWorld
My final take: Scienceprovidesevidenceorelementsofacreator…ascript…andourabilitytowitnesstheeffectsinaction.Wecanseeintheuniversealltheuniquethingsthatneedtooccurtocreate LIFE,andthateachfractalmovementinwardandoutwardoccuratdifferentlevelswiththesameprecisionandaccuracy.Thehumanexperienceismeanttogivefeedbacktothe Creatorwiththeintentofeventuallyeliminatingallunwantedpartstocreateaneverlastingperfectuniverse. Characters in theuniverseplaytheir role aseachoneofusplaysourpartinthelargerschemeofthings.Allthesoul’sinformationwillcompletethe moving picturepixelbypixelto present a grand masterpiece.
The greatest script ever written is inscribed in the stars and beyond! It is His Story…
Director Elia Kazan talks about Brando’s performance in this classic drama romance:
“ … what was extraordinary about his performance, I feel, is the contrast of the tough-guy front and the extreme delicacy and gentle cast of his behavior. What other actor, when his brother draws a pistol to force him to do something shameful, would put his hand on the gun and push it away with the gentleness of a caress? Who else could read `Oh, Charley!’ in a tone of reproach that is so loving and so melancholy and suggests the terrific depth of pain?”
Kazan in A Life (biography), also states, “I was tasting vengeance that night and enjoying it. `On the Waterfront’ is my own story; every day I worked on that film, I was telling the world where I stood and my critics to go and – – – – themselves.”
“This classic story of Mob informers was based on a number of true stories and filmed on location in and around the docks of New York and New Jersey. Mob-connected union boss Johnny Friendly (Lee J. Cobb) rules the waterfront with an iron fist. The police know that he’s been responsible for a number of murders, but witnesses play deaf and dumb (“plead D & D”). Washed-up boxer Terry Malloy (Marlon Brando) has had an errand-boy job because of the influence of his brother Charley, a crooked union lawyer (Rod Steiger). Witnessing one of Friendly’s rub-outs, Terry is willing to keep his mouth shut until he meets the dead dockworker’s sister, Edie (Eva Marie Saint). “Waterfront priest” Father Barry (Karl Malden) tells Terry that Edie’s brother was killed because he was going to testify against boss Friendly before the crime commission. Terry feels somewhat responsible for the death. When Father Barry receives a beating from Friendly’s goons, Terry is persuaded to cooperate with the commission. Featuring Brando’s famous “I coulda been a contendah” speech, On the Waterfront has often been seen as an allegory of “naming names” against suspected Communists during the anti-Communist investigations of the 1950s. Director Elia Kazan famously informed on suspected Communists before a government committee — unlike many of his colleagues, some of whom went to prison for refusing to “name names” and many more of whom were blacklisted from working in the film industry for many years to come — and Budd Schulberg’s screenplay has often been read as an elaborate defense of the informer’s position. On the Waterfront won Oscars for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Actor for Brando, and Best Supporting Actress for Saint.” – Rotten Tomatoes
On the Waterfront was nominated for eleven Oscars and won eight. This film highlights a bold fight against corruption with unforgettable dialogue, and a riveting romance that keeps this 60-year-old film just as powerful and influential today as it was in 1954.
“Shut up about that conscience... That’s all I’ve been hearing about.” Marlon Brando delivers the crux of his character and of the film in his own unique style.
Marlon Brando is widely considered the greatest movie actor of all time, rivaled only by the more theatrically oriented Laurence Olivier in terms of esteem. Unlike Olivier, who preferred the stage to the screen, Brando concentrated his talents on movies after bidding the Broadway stage adieu in 1949, a decision for which he was severely criticized when his star began to dim in the 1960s and he was excoriated for squandering his talents. No actor ever exerted such a profound influence on succeeding generations of actors as did Brando. More than 50 years after he first scorched the screen as Stanley Kowalski in the movie version of Tennessee Williams‘ A Streetcar Named Desire(1951) and a quarter-century after his last great performance as Col. Kurtz in Francis Ford Coppola‘s Apocalypse Now (1979), all American actors are still being measured by the yardstick that was Brando. It was if the shadow of John Barrymore, the great American actor closest to Brando in terms of talent and stardom, dominated the acting field up until the 1970s. He did not, nor did any other actor so dominate the public’s consciousness of what WAS an actor before or since Brando’s 1951 on-screen portrayal of Stanley made him a cultural icon. Brando eclipsed the reputation of other great actors circa 1950, such as Paul Muni and Fredric March. Only the luster of Spencer Tracy‘s reputation hasn’t dimmed when seen in the starlight thrown off by Brando. However, neither Tracy nor Olivier created an entire school of acting just by the force of his personality. Brando did.
Born Marlon Brando Jr. on April 3, 1924, in Omaha, Nebraska, to Marlon Brando, Sr., a calcium carbonate salesman and his artistically inclined wife, the former Dorothy Pennebaker, “Bud” Brando was one of three children. His oldest sister Jocelyn Brando was also an actress, taking after their mother, who engaged in amateur theatricals and mentored a then-unknown Henry Fonda, another Nebraska native, in her role as director of the Omaha Community Playhouse. Frannie, Brando’s other sibling, was a visual artist. Both Brando sisters contrived to leave the Midwest for New York City, Jocelyn to study acting and Frannie to study art. Marlon managed to escape the vocational doldrums forecast for him by his cold, distant father and his disapproving schoolteachers by striking out for The Big Apple in 1943, following Jocelyn into the acting profession. Acting was the only thing he was good at, for which he received praise, so he was determined to make it his career – a high-school dropout, he had nothing else to fall back on, having been rejected by the military due to a knee injury he incurred playing football at Shattuck Military Academy, Brando Sr.’s alma mater. The school booted Marlon out as incorrigible before graduation. – Wikipedia
Eva Marie Saint: At 89, ‘You Have More To Give’
NPR’sScottSimontalkswiththe89-year-oldmovielegend in link below.Inhonorofits60thanniversary,theAcademyofMotionPictureArtsandScienceswillscreenOntheWaterfrontonJune6,2014 in LosAngeles. The notion of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) began with Louis B. Mayer, head of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM). He wanted to create an organization that would mediate labor disputes and improve the industry’s image. So, on a Sunday evening, Mayer and three other studio big-wigs – actor Conrad Nagel, director Fred Niblo, and the head of the Association of Motion Picture Producers, Fred Beetson – sat down and discussed these matters. The idea of this elite club having an annual banquet was tossed around, but there was no mention of awards just yet. They also established that membership into the organization would only be open to people involved in one of the five branches of the industry: actors, directors, writers, technicians, and producers. (Formation May 11, 1927)
She played two of the most famous female leads in movie history. Born in New Jersey July 4, 1924, Eva Marie Saint graduated from Bowling Green State University in 1946 and spent the first seven years of her acting career working in the Golden Age of television. She made the leap to the big screen in 1954 with an Oscar-winning performance as Edie Doyle in Elia Kazan‘s masterpiece On the Waterfront (1954). She certainly brought “real acting” to a time when melodrama still ran rampant in the industry. Who can forget her memorable argument scene with Marlon Brando when she says, “I didn’t say I don’t love you, I said I want you to get out”? Five years later, she starred as Eve Kendell, the sultry spy in Alfred Hitchcock‘s North by Northwest (1959) opposite Cary Grant. The change in her screen persona, coupled with her adroit performance as a seductive woman of mystery who keeps Grant (and the audience) off-balance, was widely heralded. A suspense classic, “North by Northwest” is now considered one of the greatest films ever made. Eva Marie also received Golden Globe and BAFTA nominations for A Hatful of Rain (1957) and won an Emmy Award for the miniseries People Like Us(1990). As of late, she has been seen in the family film Because of Winn-Dixie (2005) and the action adventure Superman Returns (2006), where she played Martha Kent. Eva Marie Saint is still going strong with her work and takes the fact that she’s part of film history in her stride.
Got the part of Edie Doyle in On the Waterfront (1954) over Elizabeth Montgomery. Director Elia Kazan, in his autobiography “A Life,” says that the choice of an actress to play the part was narrowed down to Montgomery and Saint, but there were also some qualms about Saint playing a teenager, since she was 30 years old at the time. Although Montgomery was fine in her screen test, there was an air of finishing school about her. Kazan thought this genteel quality would not be becoming for Edie, who was raised on the waterfront in Hoboken, New Jersey. He gave the part to Saint, and she went on to win cinematic immortality, and a Best Supporting Actress Oscar, in the part. – Wikipedia
On the Waterfront is just as powerful and influential today as it was in 1954 because it speaks to our current political and criminal situation. From large corporate organizations to government agencies, the common man is sick of the corruption. He is examining his conscience and finding no other way… but exposing the criminal actions.
A whistleblower (whistle-blower or whistle blower) is a person who exposes misconduct, alleged dishonest or illegal activity occurring in an organization. The alleged misconduct may be classified in many ways; for example, a violation of a law, rule, regulation and/or a direct threat to public interest, such as fraud, health and safety violations, and corruption. Whistleblowers may make their allegations internally (for example, to other people within the accused organization) or externally (to regulators, law enforcement agencies, to the media or to groups concerned with the issues).
The Continental Congress enacted the first whistleblower protection law in the United States on July 30, 1778 by a unanimous vote. The Continental Congress was moved to act after an incident in 1777, when Richard Marven and Samuel Shaw blew the whistle and suffered severe retaliation by Esek Hopkins, the commander-in-chief of the Continental Navy. Congress declared that the United States would defend the two whistleblowers against a libel suit filed against them by Hopkins. The Continental Congress also declared it the duty of “all persons in the service of the United States, as well as all other the inhabitants thereof” to inform the Continental Congress or proper authorities of “misconduct, frauds or misdemeanors committed by any officers in the service of these states, which may come to their knowledge.” – Wikipedia
Conscience is an aptitude, faculty, intuition or judgment that assists in distinguishing right from wrong. Moral judgment may derive from values or norms (principles and rules). In psychological terms conscience is often described as leading to feelings of remorse when a human commits actions that go against his/her moral values and to feelings of rectitude or integrity when actions conform to such norms. The extent to which conscience informs moral judgment before an action and whether such moral judgments are or should be based in reason has occasioned debate through much of the history of Western philosophy.- Wikipedia
This Western philosophy is eloquently expressed in On the Waterfront. We may discover the deeper aspects of this powerful film when reviewing the relevant points found in Cicero’s Teaching on Natural Law by Thomas G. West. (St. John’s Review, Summer 1981. Vol. 32)
We are in the midst of a crisis – not always evident in the comfortable lives we lead, but a crisis nonetheless. A sign of the crisis is the ongoing political collapse of the West; the liberal democracies of America and Europe are barely willing to defend themselves against the insolence of petty tyrants and the armed imperialism of the Soviet Union. Why this somnolent slide into voluntary weakness? Because we are not convinced that we have anything to fight for. We are ready to believe the worst of ourselves, and the best of our adversaries, because we no longer fully believe that we deserve to survive. That is because we no longer know what the West is, and why its preservation matters for nurturing and sustaining the noblest and best of human activities. In particular, we in America no longer know why the United States is the best hope for the modern world.
“Marcus Tullius Cicero was a Roman philosopher, politician, lawyer, orator, political theorist, consul and constitutionalist. His works rank among the most influential in European culture, and today still constitute one of the most important bodies of primary material for the writing and revision of Roman history.” -Wikipedia
Why is this important?
Cicero, or rather Roman philosophy generally, represents for Heidegger an important stage in the gradual forgetting of the Greek discovery of nature, a forgetting process which has marked the whole history of the West. According to Heidegger, the very translation of Greek philosophy into Latin effaced that insight. Roman philosophy conceived natura, the nature of things, as present-at-hand and readily available to easy philosophic contemplation and the formulation of ethical doctrines. It thereby failed to renew the vibrant amplitude of the Greek physis, which embraces the emergence and coming-to-be of things no less than their distinct standing-forth in full presence before the mind’s eye. The Roman narrowing of nature therefore prepared the way for the modern view of beings as mere disposable resources, easily accessible to human projects and manipulation.
…By tremendous efforts Greek philosophy had achieved its insight into the distinction between and yet necessary belonging-together of nature and convention, being and appearance, truth and opinion, an insight anticipated in the dark lyrics of the pre-Socratic thinkers and given its consummate expression in the works of Plato and Aristotle. But now, in the moribund Roman republic, this grasp upon the tense unity of nature and convention was forgotten by politicians unformed by philosophy and philosophers disdainful of politics. …Cicero strove to reyoke the sundered pair.
Poetry and law (law taken in a wide sense, like the Greek nomos, to include custom and tradition) appear immortalize the transient or even to bring non-being into being by touching our minds and memories through words. If philosophy, which strives uncompromisingly to unveil the true nature of things, is the antithesis of poetry, it would likewise seem to be the enemy of the traditions and beliefs on which law depends and which in some measure law is. The beginning of Cicero’s laws unobtrusively questions whether law contains any truth whatever. Law, like poetry, may be nothing more than a fiction that furnishes pleasure by establishing trust in eternally binding precepts and practices. Cicero forestalls this positivist inference by drawing a distinction between two senses of the word law: the popular sense, according to which law is “that which sanctions in writing whatever it wishes, either by commanding or prohibiting,” and the more learned sense, derived from nature itself, according to which law is “the mind and reason of the prudent man.”
…Law is natural in the same way that reason is natural, as a gift of nature bestowed on every human being. But only in the prudent man, whose reason is developed as far as it can be, does reason become “correct,” and so only his commands and prohibitions are truly “law.” …Even if complete knowledge of good is unavailable, as Cicero’s skeptism implies, we may infer that an approximation to wisdom is accessible through the assiduous exercise of understanding. Cicero’s final peroration to Book I paints a picture of perfect wisdom that can be a standard, even if unattained, of human striving. Self-knowledge is the key. For once we learn that we are equipped by nature for acquiring wisdom, and we sense that the mind, as sort of image of the gods, is worthy of care and cultivation.
I know you feel these are the worst of times…
Rumor has it… its the end of paradise.
Today’s headlines read… corruption, fraud, greed …and of whistle blowers around the world coming forward to expose the corruption within corporations as well as governments. Doom and gloom are the buzz word of our day! There is much to learn from the classics. Eva Marie Saint said it well, “You have more to give!”
Terry (Marlon Brando) as well as Elia Kazan (Director) learns exactly what they are capable of doing through the process of self-knowledge. Both the common man and the man of status or wealth are enticed by the “Roman Philosophy.” And both must examine himself to make a reasonable decision on how to act as demonstrated by this film and the filmmaker.
Symphonic Suite – On the Waterfront
Leonard Bernstein (August 25, 1918 — October 14, 1990) was an American conductor, composer, author, music lecturer and pianist. He was among the first conductors born and educated in the United States of America to receive worldwide acclaim. According to The New York Times, he was “one of the most prodigiously talented and successful musicians in American history.”
I highly recommend all serious screenwriters study this film. I’ll be studying this masterpiece as I re-write Peace Lily.
…is in honor and memory of Tessa, my petite Maltese born October 6, 1993 and passed away September 18, 2009.
I was considered the 3rd dog in Tessa’s pack. Her first master was first dog, Tessa was second dog and I was third dog. No matter what I’d do to gain respect or position in Tessa’s eyes… I was “third dog.” She was so adorable and such a character, I caved to her demands…and she was very demanding…which brought me joy and contentment. Her demands…were begging for food and sitting on my lap.
Tessa had a few quirky personality traits based on her past…growing up in a less than ideal environment…thrown into the backyard with two Dobermans to fend for herself. She was about 3 pounds at that time…the runt…and a spitfire. Not far from being a replica of me….she made me smile with joy at her attitude.
Quite the problem solver…
She also liked mischief and got herself into some very serious problems. Like the time she discovered chocolate candy on the coffee table and laid in wait for her moment to snatch the candy bars…run upstairs…and hide them under the bed until nightfall. In the middle of the night…I awoke to a banging noise. It was Tessa banging her water bowl against the metal stairs to get my attention. I soon discovered several empty candy wrappers, piles of vomit everywhere, and Tessa banging the bowl. Unbelievable that she survived that terrible episode…eating more candy bars than I could… at one time!
Filled with inspiration…
She will always be my inspiration and a reminder of perfection.
As I emerged in the second half of my journey as a storyteller, launched myself into the world of screenwriting, and left behind a totally different phase of my life, I also had to let go of my friend…my companion…my little spitfire…Tessa.